Cooperate With Inspiration
Adam Grant is famously productive. He’s an exceptional teacher, and his creative output is consistent. What’s his secret? In a fabulous conversation with Tim Ferriss, he keys in on the idea of “attention management” — to say it differently, “respect for flow” — recognizing that sometimes, managing one’s attention is at odds with traditional time management.
The truth is, “flow” is a real phenomenon, and yet in today’s meeting-focused work culture, there’s very little appreciation for the flow state. The schedule rules all.
So what does Grant do when time and attention don’t jive? He respects attention, and seeks to flex on time. He asks for forgiveness, and protects the zone. “I didn’t know yesterday when I scheduled this meeting that I was going to be in flow today at this time.”
In my own modest blogging practice, I have made a simple and reliable observation: it is ~100x easier to write a blog post when I’m inspired, than when I am under a deadline (even a self-imposed deadline!). It’s made me think, “When inspiration strikes, am I willing to cooperate?”
Is there a shorthand on teams to help folks appreciate when someone is under inspiration?
There needs to be some kind of “flow safe word”…
Click here to subscribe to Paint & Pipette, the weekly digest of these daily posts.
You wanted self-starters. You built a permission structure. No wonder everyone is waiting.
He had a tattoo that said "Call me a baby because dolphins make me cry." He also said he'd pour hot oil on a kitchen robot to keep his job. I met him because I turned down Dave Grohl to hold a sign in Washington Square. Here's what I learned.
The prompt before the prompt is noticing what deserves attention.
I asked my AI chief of staff to read 50 pre-event transcripts and write the FAQ I'd been avoiding for months. It took three minutes.
Reese Witherspoon asked her book club, "do you use AI?" Three million people watched. The internet split — and both sides were right, because they were arguing about the wrong word.
A real concern is not a valid conclusion. An EVP in finance emailed me last week about AI sycophancy. Most people raise that concern as an off-ramp. He made it the curriculum.
There are levels of AI augmentation: Some people use AI to draft emails. Josh used it to run 27 agents on a single problem, from his mobile on the road, with all the context of his laptop at home. Those are not the same thing.
Andrej Karpathy hasn't typed a line of code since December. That sentence has a blank in it — fill it with your word, and something shifts.
When Manu Ginobili raised his hand during a Spurs AI session and said "Could AI...?" — that was the ball game. The answer to almost every "could it" question is yes. The problem is most people don't have a question yet.
A reader wrote the same report twice — once with plain ChatGPT, once with his Teammate Stack. Same person, same AI model, same task. Only one of them sounded like him.