Cooperate With Inspiration
Adam Grant is famously productive. He’s an exceptional teacher, and his creative output is consistent. What’s his secret? In a fabulous conversation with Tim Ferriss, he keys in on the idea of “attention management” — to say it differently, “respect for flow” — recognizing that sometimes, managing one’s attention is at odds with traditional time management.
The truth is, “flow” is a real phenomenon, and yet in today’s meeting-focused work culture, there’s very little appreciation for the flow state. The schedule rules all.
So what does Grant do when time and attention don’t jive? He respects attention, and seeks to flex on time. He asks for forgiveness, and protects the zone. “I didn’t know yesterday when I scheduled this meeting that I was going to be in flow today at this time.”
In my own modest blogging practice, I have made a simple and reliable observation: it is ~100x easier to write a blog post when I’m inspired, than when I am under a deadline (even a self-imposed deadline!). It’s made me think, “When inspiration strikes, am I willing to cooperate?”
Is there a shorthand on teams to help folks appreciate when someone is under inspiration?
There needs to be some kind of “flow safe word”…
Click here to subscribe to Paint & Pipette, the weekly digest of these daily posts.
There are levels of AI augmentation: Some people use AI to draft emails. Josh used it to run 27 agents on a single problem, from his mobile on the road, with all the context of his laptop at home. Those are not the same thing.
Andrej Karpathy hasn't typed a line of code since December. That sentence has a blank in it — fill it with your word, and something shifts.
When Manu Ginobili raised his hand during a Spurs AI session and said "Could AI...?" — that was the ball game. The answer to almost every "could it" question is yes. The problem is most people don't have a question yet.
There are two fears circulating in the age of AI. One is fuel. The other is self-fulfilling. A neuroscientist recently explained why — and it changed how I think about every AI conversation I have.
This Week: Guest Post from Brice Challamel , Head of AI Strategy and Adoption at OpenAI — If AI can draft the memo, build the deck, and prototype the product, what exactly is the professional's contribution? Brice says it's not "less" — it's "different." Read his case for the shift from authorship to stewardship.
A 40% quality boost, available to anyone. Taken up by fewer than 3% of the workforce (and that number is going down, not up). At Wharton this week, I accidentally said the thing that explains why.
The engineer who experiments with 40 prompts shows up on the dashboard. The finance manager who quietly kills three recurring reports doesn't — even though she's the one who actually changed. A guest post from Logitech's Head of Global AI.
AI can make you 100x more productive at work, and make being present at home feel 100x more expensive. That tension isn’t just personal weakness. It’s a new economic reality.
I almost moved a family trip for two business opportunities. That moment made me ask a question I think every AI power user needs to sit with: What if your biggest AI risk isn’t bad output, but a misallocated life?
A real concern is not a valid conclusion. An EVP in finance emailed me last week about AI sycophancy. Most people raise that concern as an off-ramp. He made it the curriculum.