Most breakthroughs are more like “break ins.”
And I don’t mean that in a good way.
From what I gather, inspiration is something that happens to most people. It “sneaks up” on them. In a way, folks are the victims of a breakthrough more often than they are the perpetrators.
It doesn’t have to be this way. We can go on the offensive. We can court the muse, pursue inspiration, tempt lightning… In short, I believe we can commit a breakthrough. Or at least, we can increase our odds of committing one.
And rather than spell out how, I’ll give a simple homework assignment to anyone who’s interested:
First, take stock: “How did I arrive at my last breakthrough? What was it? How did it happen? What events or thoughts or interactions or observations precipitated it?” Write down the four or five steps which preceded the insight, which sparked the “Aha!” moment…
Chances are, you just reverse-engineered your own personal breakthrough process.
Next, take action: Take the description of your last breakthrough, and treat it as a prescription for your next one. “What problem am I trying to solve? If breaking through in this context were like the last one, what might I do to replicate the steps?”
I know, I know, serendipity can’t be manufactured. I get it.
But what if it can?
Click here to subscribe to Paint & Pipette, the weekly digest of these daily posts.
I've spent twenty years telling people to make time for innovation. Last week, in front of a room I love teaching, I finally saw the flaw in the advice.
The chief AI officer of Logitech texted me a list of my AI tells. My first instinct was exactly wrong.
The most important KPI of the AI era is one you've never heard of — because I made it up. It's called TTFS, nobody's dashboard tracks it, and yours is probably way too high.
The people most worried about AI are using it the most. The people using it least aren't worried — they've left the field. That quiet exit is the most expensive instinct in professional life.
I heard it inside the Fort Knox of plutonium, from some of the smartest engineers alive: "AI is just not there yet." Here's what that sentence actually costs.
The build took an hour. The insight took sixteen years. You probably have a number that would move your business and has never hit a dashboard — not because it's unmeasurable, but because no one ever named it."
What if the best AI economy isn't one person building a billion-dollar company, but a million people building businesses they actually care about? A guest essay from my Beyond the Prompt co-host Henrik Werdelin and his Audos co-founder Nicholas Thorne.
A household-name CEO couldn’t find the app. Turns out he’d never installed it. Four tactics for the leaders who should be ahead, and aren’t.